Skip to content
No Games Chicago
  • Our Publications
  • The No Games Chicago Book
  • Campaign To Stop The 2016 Olympics
  • Fight!
  • Live From Vancouver
  • Live From Copenhagen
  • IOC Says “No Games” To Chicago – What Now?
  • About/Press
  • Audio
  • About the Olympics
  • Background
  • Contact Tom
  • Fight!
September 24, 2009 / Chicago 2016

Let’s Spend $5 Billion To Generate $4.4 Billion!

Crain’s Chicago reports that anew independent study of the 2016 Olympic plan debunks their inflated claims of economic benefits. The new study, by Anderson Economic Group of Michigan, estimates the games would generate $4.4 billion in total economic impact. Download the report.

Since the 2016 folks say the games will cost about $5 billion (No Games Chicago believes the true cost will be MUCH higher), the entire project will generate less impact then ot costs to produce and stage the games. We might as well just raise that money and give it directly to needy Chicagoans to pay their bills and purchase homes.

Crain’s further reports:

The firm also raises warnings about potential costs to taxpayers, estimating that the public could be on the hook for up to half the cost of the Olympic Village. Chicago 2016 plans for private developers to shoulder all of the $1-billion project cost. “There has, however, been some doubt that sufficient private funds will become available,” the report states.

Anderson predicts taxpayers could be exposed to cover $500 million in costs related to the village, or purchasing insurance for the games that is expected to total about $68 million in premiums. Those factors reduce the economic benefit of spending from the Olympic Village project and the overall economic benefit to taxpayers from hosting the games.

Chicago – please JOIN us to protest this scam! We are rallying in front of City Hall on Tuesday, September 29 at 5:30pm.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Atlanta Community Leader Sets The 96 Games Record Straight

Next Post:

Sportswriter for Nation Lays It Out – “No Games For Chicago!”

8 Commments

  1. john kesrouan says:
    September 25, 2009 at 3:41 am

    The games last for two weeks, the tax increases to pay for them will be forever.

  2. tim smith says:
    September 25, 2009 at 4:22 am

    You know, I think i heard the dude from this site on the radio talking about how “all of the economists who say the games can/will be profitable aren’t from Chicago”.

    I’m fascinated that firm in fiscally solvent ::burp:: Michigan offers these comments and a Chicagocentric org like NGC publishes it as gospel.

  3. Laura Louzader says:
    September 26, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Rio has budgeted $14.4 Billion for the games with complete guarantees from local and national governments there, that all expenses for the games will be met. This shows that Rio organizers have a handle on reality and are cognizant of the true costs of these games, while Chicago promoters prefer to lie and dissemble, squirreling public money away in TIF slush funds while starving the city of needed services and improvements. Our local promoters know that Chicagoans will not stand for such a massive commitment of public money, so they can’t speak the truth.

    I believe Rio will probably be awarded the bid because of this. Their budget is greater than those of the other three bidding cities combined, and while there is some citizen protest against the games there, there is nothing like the public outcry against the games here in Chicago. Additionally, the Brazilian economy is currently more stable than ours is or will be for a long time.

    All in all, Rio probably looks like way more gain for much less pain to the IOC. Let’s hope that is indeed the case this coming Friday.

  4. Anonymous says:
    September 26, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    This coming Friday will be the verdict. If we get stuck with the steroid developers’ convention, I’m OUTTA HERE!!!!!!!! On a one-way mission as far as I can move. Until the car runs out of road to drive on.

  5. DNIT says:
    September 26, 2009 at 11:26 pm

    Laura, the budget for Rio has a much higher amount (actually it is $2.8bi for the games, and $11.6bi for infrastructure needed for them).

    Just to give an idea the PanAm 2007 games cost around $2.5bi, how come they want to organize a much bigger event with just $300million more? For the record, it will be almost impossible to use the venues from the Pan Am games for the Olympics.

    Have you guys actually made the math on how much it “would cost per-capita” for you this Olympics should Chicago win?

  6. DNIT says:
    September 26, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    What I wanted to say is that it will be much higher, than that…

  7. Laura Louzader says:
    September 26, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    $14.4 Billion is the figure Rio is guaranteeing.

    Inasmuch as the host city has to guarantee any overruns, and the London 2012 games are up to $16 Billion already, I’m sure Rio’s games will cost still more.

    Whatever.. it will break their budget, but maybe they don’t care.

  8. kat says:
    September 29, 2009 at 10:03 am

    Well.. my fiirst issue is the fact that President Obama,his wife,and Oprah is going to strong arm their celebrity to get what they want. Like hey I’m the first black President,and here is a very rich black celeb Oprah,and you better not say no to us. This is the part that disgusts me first of all. And I can surely understand how abusive the powers can be to poorer common folk in Chicago if the Olympics were held there. I hope the commity holds firm,and doesn’t let the blackness,or strong arm power influence their decision. Again I think it very inappropriate to have Obama go to Denmark,and make a plea. I think it is using his power where he has NO business using it!

Comments are closed.

Tom Tresser’s Facebook Page

Tom Tresser’s Facebook Page

Recent Posts

  • No Games Book Published!
  • Olympics Continues To Waste Billions
  • Why the Olympics are a “City Killer”
  • 2022 Winter Olympics – The Genocide Games
  • No Games Makes It Into History

Contents

  • About
    • Audio
    • Videos
  • About/Press
  • Campaign To Stop The 2016 Olympics
    • “Clout Fest” Gallery
    • 30 Days To Go!
    • Chicago 2016
      • Civic Federation Report
        • Civic Federation Board-2016 Relationships
        • Civic Federation Report – “Experts” Have Major Conflicts
        • Pat Ryan at the Civic Federation
    • Events
    • For the IOC
    • Get The Truth!
    • Important Documents
      • About Chicago 2016
      • About the Olympics
      • Background
    • Live From Copenhagen
    • Other Cities
    • Rally April 2
    • September 29 Rally
    • Silent Civic Groups
    • Switzerland Diary
    • Take Action
    • Tell the President
  • Contact Tom
  • Fight!
  • IOC Says “No Games” To Chicago – What Now?
  • Live From Vancouver
  • No Games News
    • “Thanks No Games!”
    • No Games Email Newsletters to the IOC
  • Our Publications
  • Speaker’s Bureau
  • The No Games Chicago Book

Archives

  • November 2022
  • February 2022
  • October 2021
  • January 2020
  • September 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • January 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • March 2015
  • July 2014
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Categories

  • 2018 Olympics
  • 2020 Olympics
  • 2022 Olympics
  • 2024 Olympics
  • Chicago 2016
  • Chris Shaw
  • Civil rights abuse
  • Copenhagen
  • Corruption
  • Cost
  • Environmental assault
  • London
  • Mega Projects
  • Montreal
  • No Boston Olympics
  • No Games
  • NOlympicsLA
  • Other finalist cities
  • President
  • Privatization
  • Promotion
  • Public meeting
  • Reasons to say "NO!"
  • Rio 2016
  • Sochi
  • Support
  • Take action
  • Uncategorized
  • Vancouver
  • What Now?

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 No Games Chicago - Powered by SimplyNews